3 Month Old And Anbesol

FOR THE LEFT AND GOVERNANCE 'ALWAYS A BLUFF!

Giacomo Stucchi

To hear some comments from members of the opposition is still really stunned. Not so much for the opinions of the executive, understandably critical given that come from those who are in opposition (and now in a while '), but as for the idea that the left has the function of Government . We try to be more explicit. For the Northern League rule is to have a program on things to do, carry on in Parliament and, above all, give constantly accountable to the people. The principle is the same in the case of a region rather than a province or a municipality, where, however, the comparison with all political forces, it's useful. However, comes the moment when decisions are taken, even by majority vote. The legitimacy is given to the government by popular vote and the subsequent parliamentary majority, and hence the government decision, taken under the law are fully entitled. But there's more. A self-respecting government in office is required to make decisions, not to, in addition to keeping the country in a perpetual stalemate, would result in a grave responsibility before the voters. That said, the point is that whatever the measure adopted by the Berlusconi government, the reform on fiscal federalism than about justice, the safety measures on nuclear program, the left instead of comparing the merits of the proposals is limited to the usual obstructions. On the reform of justice, for example, this government is not entitled to it because the premier is indicted. On the nuclear recovery plan launched by the Prime Minister's office is just a bluff because in reality the government has no intention of taking it forward. What about fiscal federalism, this would be an illusory reform is useful only to the Northern League as a campaign ad. In short, we understood that for the left, probably remembering his recent experience leading the country, governing means only pretend to make decisions. It 's too easy, and convenient for those who are not responsible for the opposition and government, always throw it up on the bluff or who knows what else. They came even to deny the magnitude of the immigration, Interior Minister Roberto Maroni, fortunately, has never taken seriously. The facts not only prove him right (to date, as the minister said in response to Question Time in the House, 11,285 immigrants arrived, only Tunisia, but in the end of 2010 it had reached 4,406, thanks to an agreement with Libya, that is no longer operational), but contradict the usual easy come of the left. Just think what would have happened if there had been at the Interior Ministry one of them!

Analysis Questions Lab 5

ON NUCLEAR BUT NOT FOR THE PURPOSE IS TO DISCUSS REFORM

Giacomo Stucchi

The violence of the earthquake and tsunami that hit so hard in Japan burst into our homes with the power of television images. What is documented is probably only a fraction of what has happened in that distant land, but gives you an idea of \u200b\u200bthe immense cataclysm. By chance this disaster, with explosions of nuclear reactors, has become (if possible) even more serious and coincident with the debate on nuclear power in Italy, a few months after the celebration of the referendum promoted dall'Idv Di Pietro. Readers may perhaps seem surreal approach as the former PM to dramatic events of recent days but the policy of our country, and especially how to interpret some of the opposition, we would have to address that as well. If on one hand it is plain that what is happening in Japan inspire debate, inside and outside Parliament, whether or not a return to nuclear power, on the other hand seems rather out of place that the opposition tries to ride the events to revive the referendum. The choice of the forms of supply of a country, sometimes obliged, however, is too important to discuss, as they are doing Bersani Di Pietro and his ally, or the same members of the Greens only and only for equipment, and in addition the wave of emotion that inevitably provokes in people a tragedy like the one in place in Japan. In reality, the danger of catastrophic earthquakes like that which occurred in Japan, as determined by the conjunction of the planet in that part of four continental plates, fortunately is not the same that exists in Italy. What about the fact that, like it or not, also not wanting to build nuclear power plants in our area, however we will always close, with the consequences that this implies, that in France, Switzerland and Germany. When one cites the example of righteousness on the nuclear moratorium announced by Angela Merkel, one must also take into account the premier German makes reference to the old generation plant, built ten or fifteen years ago, which certainly did not have safety devices that are present in those instead of new generation. In short, the debate is open and it could be that we should discuss the advantages or disadvantages of nuclear power. What we do not believe either appropriate or politically correct is to transform the debate on nuclear power in yet another campaign against the Berlusconi government. Raising its atomic program the Executive has done, as is normal for all governments who care about the fate of their citizens, a political choice. This is no way and time to discuss, but not to make yet another argument for electoral purposes.

Why Would A Wart Turn Black

EQUIPMENT MUST BE MADE IN THE INTERESTS OF ALL THE USUAL DESPITE

Giacomo Stucchi

The dialogue in the bicameral Commission to bring to fruition a view shared by the majority and the opposition signed on federalism and regional health, shall and will need a few more days for comparison. Ben is a short period and then more work in the Commission if this leads to a good result after the specious arguments in its decision approving the decree on municipal federalism. There is, however, open another front on which the controversy blows strong oppositions, and all those (from trade associations to certain information) they do not want that the reforms are implemented in this country, and that is justice. Criticism of preventive Pd, which the mouth of the President of the Senate Anna Finocchiaro said the reform would be dictated only by a personal grudge against the President of the Council of the Judiciary, as well as statements by the deputy prosecutor in Milan, Armando Spataro , which announced that "there will be answers epochal epochal reforms" of the judiciary, give a fair reflection of the climate in which we operate. Apart from the content for the time of the reform of the judicial system launched by the Government, on which there will be time and opportunity to intervene in the coming days, the point is that as usual Executive and the majority, fully legitimized by the popular vote to move forward in their program, must deal with a climate barricadiero. This is called art by some politicians in opposition, with the help (sorry to say) of journalists militants of their political party. A couple of considerations are enough to make the idea. Support, for example, as do some television pundits in the salons of the Left, that the reform of the judicial system should be done without touching the roles and responsibilities of the judiciary is an oxymoron. It's like saying, for example, that we must reform the system of agricultural production of farmers, however, not to mention! And 'the inconclusiveness of the usual left. E 'success with the reform of the school which bears the signature of the Minister Gelmini, according to the usual Bersani and Di Pietro, we should have done without revisiting roles and responsibilities of key players in that field, or teachers. Or as was the case for the reform of civil procedure launched by the government in office that, according to the left, would have to do the following letter to the opinions of the professional association of civil lawyer. But please! How do you not understand that the reforms should be done not by looking to the interests of certain categories, but those of all citizens. What can be said of certain television programs, such as Exit La7, conducted by Mrs. D'Amico, who only follow the thread of left-wing propaganda? Some boycotters media, however, should resign because the ongoing reform process will continue in the interest of the sovereign people.