James Stucchi
Already immediately after the vote of the Bicameral on Federalism, which appeared when it became clear that the debate did not concern more on the substantive issues of reform, but had become instrumental to the strategy of new and old opponents of the government to boycott the 'legislative action of the majority, we emphasized that the opinion was the result of a situation from the distorted representation of the important parliamentary body. The Northern League has as its objective the continuation of the experience of government, but to make reforms. We are and always will for dialogue, even more so when it comes to approve structural reforms, but there comes a time when we must pull the money and the government must go forward and not remain mired in the limbo of parliamentary procedures. It 'just what they seek some spoilers of democracy that for some' time have now decided to "undermine" the legislative measures: the parliamentary level, preventing that they can move forward; on the media plan, a campaign promoting disinformation. Ficale on federalism, for example, the actions of the usual cheerleaders on television Finian try to instill fear among the public that the reform will automatically result in an increase in taxes for all citizens. A fact that says a lot about what their attitude towards our reform, in particular, but I would say of the Government, as a whole. Without entering into the merits of legislative and administrative, fiscal federalism, which introduces in our system, just remember that the increase in tax burden at the local level is not a conditio sine qua non, but an eventuality that would relate only to local government inefficient squandering their resources or that they were not able to adopt the standard costs for municipal services to the citizens. In other words, higher taxes at the local level only cares about those who throw away, or used badly, the taxpayers' money. But we are more than confident that should your these circumstances, then it would be the first to the public not to renew the trust of their administrators. It seems clear, therefore, as the opposition intend to move forward on the path of propaganda just to make me look bad in the eyes of public opinion on the reform of fiscal federalism. In this, also benefited from the composition of standing committees, whose mission today is highly imbalanced. In these important organs, including that of the Bicameral on Federalism, which must express other opinions on the decrees, it is ironic that the political majority in fact does not result in a numerical superiority.
0 comments:
Post a Comment